Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Redlands
This post compares Riverbank, California to Redlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Redlands (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 70,765 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $54,151 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $350,900 |
| White | 79% | 71% |
| Black | 0% | 7% |
| Asian | 4% | 7% |
| With Kids | 46% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 35 |
| Rentals | 32% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Redlands?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Redlands: 24047 compared with 70765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Redlands?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Redlands?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 42% for Redlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z