Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Riverbank, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $444,200 |
| White | 79% | 62% |
| Black | 0% | 9% |
| Asian | 4% | 13% |
| With Kids | 46% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 35 |
| Rentals | 32% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 24047 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rancho Cucamonga does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z