Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Porterville
This post compares Riverbank, California to Porterville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Porterville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 58,782 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $36,312 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $163,100 |
| White | 79% | 77% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 46% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 30 |
| Rentals | 32% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Porterville?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Porterville: 24047 compared with 58782 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Porterville?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Porterville?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 46% for Porterville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z