Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Riverbank, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $633,400 |
| White | 79% | 75% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 13% |
| With Kids | 46% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 32% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Pleasant Hill?
A: Riverbank has a smaller population count than Pleasant Hill: 24047 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pleasant Hill does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z