Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Pico Rivera
This post compares Riverbank, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $380,200 |
| White | 79% | 55% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 3% |
| With Kids | 46% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 36 |
| Rentals | 32% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Pico Rivera?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Pico Rivera: 24047 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pico Rivera does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 32% for Riverbank versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z