Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Pasadena
This post compares Riverbank, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $689,700 |
| White | 79% | 53% |
| Black | 0% | 10% |
| Asian | 4% | 16% |
| With Kids | 46% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 37 |
| Rentals | 32% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Pasadena?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Pasadena: 24047 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z