Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Palm Springs
This post compares Riverbank, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $340,600 |
| White | 79% | 83% |
| Black | 0% | 4% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 46% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 54 |
| Rentals | 32% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Palm Springs?
A: Riverbank has a smaller population count than Palm Springs: 24047 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z