Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to National City
This post compares Riverbank, California to National City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | National City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 60,715 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $30,943 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $345,400 |
| White | 79% | 61% |
| Black | 0% | 5% |
| Asian | 4% | 19% |
| With Kids | 46% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 32 |
| Rentals | 32% | 67% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or National City?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than National City: 24047 compared with 60715 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in National City?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or National City?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: National City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 67% for National City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z