Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Los Angeles
This post compares Riverbank, California to Los Angeles, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Los Angeles (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 3,949,776 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $40,932 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $549,800 |
| White | 79% | 52% |
| Black | 0% | 8% |
| Asian | 4% | 11% |
| With Kids | 46% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 35 |
| Rentals | 32% | 63% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Los Angeles?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Los Angeles: 24047 compared with 3949776 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Los Angeles?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Los Angeles?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 63% for Los Angeles.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z