Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Livermore
This post compares Riverbank, California to Livermore, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Livermore (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 88,232 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $75,750 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $643,200 |
| White | 79% | 78% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 10% |
| With Kids | 46% | 36% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 32% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Livermore?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Livermore: 24047 compared with 88232 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Livermore?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Livermore?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverbank does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 32% for Riverbank versus 28% for Livermore.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z