Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Lathrop
This post compares Riverbank, California to Lathrop, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Lathrop (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 21,050 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $47,279 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $292,900 |
| White | 79% | 44% |
| Black | 0% | 6% |
| Asian | 4% | 25% |
| With Kids | 46% | 52% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 33 |
| Rentals | 32% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Lathrop?
A: Riverbank has a similar population count than Lathrop: 24047 compared with 21050 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Lathrop?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Lathrop?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverbank does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 32% for Riverbank versus 29% for Lathrop.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z