Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Lancaster
This post compares Riverbank, California to Lancaster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Lancaster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 160,113 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $42,993 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $213,100 |
| White | 79% | 62% |
| Black | 0% | 21% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 46% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 32 |
| Rentals | 32% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Lancaster?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Lancaster: 24047 compared with 160113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Lancaster?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Lancaster?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 46% for Lancaster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z