Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Lake Forest
This post compares Riverbank, California to Lake Forest, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Lake Forest (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 81,812 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $64,458 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $585,100 |
| White | 79% | 67% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 15% |
| With Kids | 46% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 32% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Lake Forest?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Lake Forest: 24047 compared with 81812 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Lake Forest?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Lake Forest?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverbank does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 32% for Riverbank versus 30% for Lake Forest.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z