Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to La Verne
This post compares Riverbank, California to La Verne, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | La Verne (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 32,320 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $57,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $535,900 |
| White | 79% | 74% |
| Black | 0% | 4% |
| Asian | 4% | 7% |
| With Kids | 46% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 43 |
| Rentals | 32% | 25% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or La Verne?
A: Riverbank has a smaller population count than La Verne: 24047 compared with 32320 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in La Verne?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or La Verne?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 25% for La Verne.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z