Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Jurupa Valley
This post compares Riverbank, California to Jurupa Valley, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Jurupa Valley (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 102,202 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $38,551 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $308,900 |
| White | 79% | 54% |
| Black | 0% | 3% |
| Asian | 4% | 2% |
| With Kids | 46% | 47% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 31 |
| Rentals | 32% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Jurupa Valley?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Jurupa Valley: 24047 compared with 102202 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Jurupa Valley?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Jurupa Valley?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Jurupa Valley does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 32% for Riverbank versus 34% for Jurupa Valley.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z