Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Irvine
This post compares Riverbank, California to Irvine, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Irvine (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 256,877 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $81,453 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $753,400 |
| White | 79% | 47% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 41% |
| With Kids | 46% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 34 |
| Rentals | 32% | 51% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Irvine?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Irvine: 24047 compared with 256877 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Irvine?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Irvine?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Irvine does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 51% for Irvine.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z