Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Gardena
This post compares Riverbank, California to Gardena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Gardena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 60,096 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $40,279 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $407,000 |
| White | 79% | 22% |
| Black | 0% | 23% |
| Asian | 4% | 25% |
| With Kids | 46% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
| Rentals | 32% | 50% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Gardena?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Gardena: 24047 compared with 60096 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Gardena?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Gardena?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Gardena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 50% for Gardena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z