Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Fresno
This post compares Riverbank, California to Fresno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Fresno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 519,037 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $39,069 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $206,800 |
| White | 79% | 56% |
| Black | 0% | 7% |
| Asian | 4% | 13% |
| With Kids | 46% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 30 |
| Rentals | 32% | 53% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Fresno?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Fresno: 24047 compared with 519037 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Fresno?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Fresno?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fresno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 53% for Fresno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z