Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Foothill Farms
This post compares Riverbank, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $201,200 |
| White | 79% | 67% |
| Black | 0% | 9% |
| Asian | 4% | 5% |
| With Kids | 46% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 33 |
| Rentals | 32% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Foothill Farms?
A: Riverbank has a smaller population count than Foothill Farms: 24047 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z