Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Fontana
This post compares Riverbank, California to Fontana, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Fontana (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 207,086 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $40,918 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $323,300 |
| White | 79% | 43% |
| Black | 0% | 8% |
| Asian | 4% | 6% |
| With Kids | 46% | 53% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 30 |
| Rentals | 32% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Fontana?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Fontana: 24047 compared with 207086 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Fontana?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Fontana?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fontana does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 32% for Riverbank versus 35% for Fontana.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z