Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Folsom
This post compares Riverbank, California to Folsom, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Folsom (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 75,897 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $84,884 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $456,600 |
| White | 79% | 69% |
| Black | 0% | 4% |
| Asian | 4% | 16% |
| With Kids | 46% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
| Rentals | 32% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Folsom?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Folsom: 24047 compared with 75897 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Folsom?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Folsom?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverbank does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 32% for Riverbank versus 30% for Folsom.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z