Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Florence-Graham
This post compares Riverbank, California to Florence-Graham, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Florence-Graham (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 63,821 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $24,701 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $301,000 |
| White | 79% | 37% |
| Black | 0% | 7% |
| Asian | 4% | 0% |
| With Kids | 46% | 56% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 28 |
| Rentals | 32% | 64% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Florence-Graham?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Florence-Graham: 24047 compared with 63821 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Florence-Graham?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Florence-Graham?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Florence-Graham does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 64% for Florence-Graham.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z