Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Elk Grove
This post compares Riverbank, California to Elk Grove, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Elk Grove (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 166,228 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $60,199 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $349,500 |
| White | 79% | 45% |
| Black | 0% | 11% |
| Asian | 4% | 28% |
| With Kids | 46% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 36 |
| Rentals | 32% | 27% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Elk Grove?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Elk Grove: 24047 compared with 166228 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Elk Grove?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Elk Grove?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 27% for Elk Grove.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z