Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Eastvale
This post compares Riverbank, California to Eastvale, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Eastvale (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 59,733 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $61,490 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $496,000 |
| White | 79% | 42% |
| Black | 0% | 8% |
| Asian | 4% | 26% |
| With Kids | 46% | 57% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 33 |
| Rentals | 32% | 24% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Eastvale?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Eastvale: 24047 compared with 59733 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Eastvale?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Eastvale?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 24% for Eastvale.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z