Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Culver City
This post compares Riverbank, California to Culver City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Culver City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 39,432 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $65,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $735,600 |
| White | 79% | 62% |
| Black | 0% | 7% |
| Asian | 4% | 15% |
| With Kids | 46% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
| Rentals | 32% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Culver City?
A: Riverbank has a smaller population count than Culver City: 24047 compared with 39432 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Culver City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Culver City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Culver City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 46% for Culver City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z