Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Costa Mesa
This post compares Riverbank, California to Costa Mesa, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Costa Mesa (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 112,930 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $51,033 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $671,800 |
| White | 79% | 70% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 8% |
| With Kids | 46% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 34 |
| Rentals | 32% | 60% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Costa Mesa?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Costa Mesa: 24047 compared with 112930 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Costa Mesa?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Costa Mesa?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Costa Mesa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 60% for Costa Mesa.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z