Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Corcoran
This post compares Riverbank, California to Corcoran, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Corcoran (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,047 | 22,650 |
Income (median) | $42,277 | $35,242 |
Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $122,700 |
White | 79% | 62% |
Black | 0% | 11% |
Asian | 4% | 0% |
With Kids | 46% | 49% |
Age (median) | 32 | 34 |
Rentals | 32% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Corcoran?
A: Riverbank has a similar population count than Corcoran: 24047 compared with 22650 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Corcoran?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Corcoran?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Corcoran does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 54% for Corcoran.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z