Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Concord
This post compares Riverbank, California to Concord, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Concord (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 128,160 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $56,608 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $461,700 |
| White | 79% | 67% |
| Black | 0% | 3% |
| Asian | 4% | 11% |
| With Kids | 46% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 38 |
| Rentals | 32% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Concord?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Concord: 24047 compared with 128160 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Concord?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Concord?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Concord does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 40% for Concord.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z