Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Chula Vista
This post compares Riverbank, California to Chula Vista, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Chula Vista (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 264,101 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $49,825 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $433,500 |
| White | 79% | 66% |
| Black | 0% | 4% |
| Asian | 4% | 15% |
| With Kids | 46% | 44% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 34 |
| Rentals | 32% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Chula Vista?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Chula Vista: 24047 compared with 264101 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Chula Vista?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Chula Vista?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Chula Vista does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 42% for Chula Vista.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z