Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Chino Hills
This post compares Riverbank, California to Chino Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Chino Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 78,025 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $66,607 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $567,200 |
| White | 79% | 46% |
| Black | 0% | 4% |
| Asian | 4% | 33% |
| With Kids | 46% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 38 |
| Rentals | 32% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Chino Hills?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Chino Hills: 24047 compared with 78025 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Chino Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Chino Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 23% for Chino Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z