Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Ceres
This post compares Riverbank, California to Ceres, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Ceres (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 47,650 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $37,711 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $218,300 |
| White | 79% | 64% |
| Black | 0% | 3% |
| Asian | 4% | 6% |
| With Kids | 46% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 30 |
| Rentals | 32% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Ceres?
A: Riverbank has a smaller population count than Ceres: 24047 compared with 47650 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Ceres?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Ceres?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ceres does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 40% for Ceres.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z