Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Cathedral City
This post compares Riverbank, California to Cathedral City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Cathedral City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 53,733 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $33,790 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $232,400 |
| White | 79% | 76% |
| Black | 0% | 3% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 46% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 37 |
| Rentals | 32% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Cathedral City?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Cathedral City: 24047 compared with 53733 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Cathedral City?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Cathedral City?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Cathedral City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 39% for Cathedral City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z