Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Burbank
This post compares Riverbank, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Burbank (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,047 | 104,765 |
Income (median) | $42,277 | $57,804 |
Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $574,300 |
White | 79% | 70% |
Black | 0% | 2% |
Asian | 4% | 11% |
With Kids | 46% | 27% |
Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
Rentals | 32% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Burbank?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Burbank: 24047 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z