Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Baldwin Park
This post compares Riverbank, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $357,500 |
| White | 79% | 34% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 18% |
| With Kids | 46% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 33 |
| Rentals | 32% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Baldwin Park?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Baldwin Park: 24047 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z