Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Bakersfield
This post compares Riverbank, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 372,680 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $44,447 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $228,400 |
| White | 79% | 68% |
| Black | 0% | 7% |
| Asian | 4% | 7% |
| With Kids | 46% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 30 |
| Rentals | 32% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Bakersfield?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 24047 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z