Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Azusa
This post compares Riverbank, California to Azusa, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Azusa (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 49,029 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $36,825 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $367,500 |
| White | 79% | 45% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 12% |
| With Kids | 46% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 29 |
| Rentals | 32% | 47% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Azusa?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Azusa: 24047 compared with 49029 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Azusa?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Azusa?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Azusa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 47% for Azusa.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z