Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Atwater
This post compares Riverbank, California to Atwater, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Atwater (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 29,118 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $35,415 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $179,400 |
| White | 79% | 58% |
| Black | 0% | 3% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 46% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 30 |
| Rentals | 32% | 49% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Atwater?
A: Riverbank has a similar population count than Atwater: 24047 compared with 29118 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Atwater?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Atwater?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Atwater does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 49% for Atwater.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z