Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Alhambra
This post compares Riverbank, California to Alhambra, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Alhambra (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 85,168 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $42,713 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $553,800 |
| White | 79% | 22% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 50% |
| With Kids | 46% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
| Rentals | 32% | 59% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Alhambra?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Alhambra: 24047 compared with 85168 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Alhambra?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Alhambra?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Alhambra does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 59% for Alhambra.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z