Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Alameda
This post compares Riverbank, California to Alameda, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Alameda (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 78,246 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $71,080 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $729,100 |
| White | 79% | 48% |
| Black | 0% | 7% |
| Asian | 4% | 31% |
| With Kids | 46% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 41 |
| Rentals | 32% | 53% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Alameda?
A: Riverbank has a much smaller population count than Alameda: 24047 compared with 78246 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Alameda?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Alameda?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Alameda does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 53% for Alameda.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z