Compare-Cities.com
Compare Riverbank to Agoura Hills
This post compares Riverbank, California to Agoura Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Riverbank (city) | Agoura Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,047 | 20,736 |
| Income (median) | $42,277 | $80,143 |
| Home Value (median) | $247,200 | $745,000 |
| White | 79% | 82% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 8% |
| With Kids | 46% | 36% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 44 |
| Rentals | 32% | 25% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Riverbank or Agoura Hills?
A: Riverbank has a similar population count than Agoura Hills: 24047 compared with 20736 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Riverbank or in Agoura Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Riverbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Riverbank or Agoura Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Riverbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 32% for Riverbank versus 25% for Agoura Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Riverbank may include: Galt, Visalia, and Reedley.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z