Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ridgecrest to South San Francisco
This post compares Ridgecrest, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ridgecrest (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,728 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $53,642 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $169,500 | $697,400 |
| White | 74% | 33% |
| Black | 5% | 2% |
| Asian | 6% | 39% |
| With Kids | 33% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 39 |
| Rentals | 37% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ridgecrest or South San Francisco?
A: Ridgecrest has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 28728 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ridgecrest or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Ridgecrest.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ridgecrest or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Ridgecrest.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 37% for Ridgecrest versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ridgecrest may include: Redlands, Apple-Valley, and Clovis.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z