Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ridgecrest to San Francisco
This post compares Ridgecrest, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Ridgecrest (city) | San Francisco (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 28,728 | 864,263 |
Income (median) | $53,642 | $74,841 |
Home Value (median) | $169,500 | $927,400 |
White | 74% | 47% |
Black | 5% | 5% |
Asian | 6% | 34% |
With Kids | 33% | 18% |
Age (median) | 35 | 38 |
Rentals | 37% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ridgecrest or San Francisco?
A: Ridgecrest has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 28728 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ridgecrest or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Ridgecrest.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ridgecrest or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Ridgecrest.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 37% for Ridgecrest versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ridgecrest may include: Redlands, Apple-Valley, and Clovis.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z