Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ridgecrest to San Fernando
This post compares Ridgecrest, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ridgecrest (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,728 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $53,642 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $169,500 | $370,300 |
| White | 74% | 57% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 6% | 1% |
| With Kids | 33% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 33 |
| Rentals | 37% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ridgecrest or San Fernando?
A: Ridgecrest has a similar population count than San Fernando: 28728 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ridgecrest or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Ridgecrest.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ridgecrest or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Ridgecrest.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 37% for Ridgecrest versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ridgecrest may include: Redlands, Apple-Valley, and Clovis.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z