Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ridgecrest to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Ridgecrest, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ridgecrest (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,728 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $53,642 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $169,500 | $444,200 |
| White | 74% | 62% |
| Black | 5% | 9% |
| Asian | 6% | 13% |
| With Kids | 33% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 35 |
| Rentals | 37% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ridgecrest or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Ridgecrest has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 28728 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ridgecrest or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Ridgecrest.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ridgecrest or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Ridgecrest.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rancho Cucamonga does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 37% for Ridgecrest versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ridgecrest may include: Redlands, Apple-Valley, and Clovis.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z