Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richmond to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Richmond, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Richmond (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 108,853 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $42,533 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $371,900 | $322,800 |
| White | 39% | 36% |
| Black | 20% | 1% |
| Asian | 14% | 10% |
| With Kids | 34% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 32 |
| Rentals | 49% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richmond or South San Jose Hills?
A: Richmond has a much larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 108853 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richmond or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Richmond.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richmond or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Richmond.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Richmond does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Richmond versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richmond may include: Vallejo, Pittsburg, and Suisun-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z