Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richmond to South San Francisco
This post compares Richmond, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Richmond (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 108,853 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $42,533 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $371,900 | $697,400 |
| White | 39% | 33% |
| Black | 20% | 2% |
| Asian | 14% | 39% |
| With Kids | 34% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 39 |
| Rentals | 49% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richmond or South San Francisco?
A: Richmond has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 108853 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richmond or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Richmond.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richmond or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Richmond.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Richmond does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Richmond versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richmond may include: Vallejo, Pittsburg, and Suisun-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z