Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richmond to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Richmond, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Richmond (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 108,853 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $42,533 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $371,900 | $374,600 |
| White | 39% | 81% |
| Black | 20% | 1% |
| Asian | 14% | 3% |
| With Kids | 34% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 38 |
| Rentals | 49% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richmond or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Richmond has a much larger population count than South Lake Tahoe: 108853 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richmond or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Richmond.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richmond or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Richmond.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 49% for Richmond versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richmond may include: Vallejo, Pittsburg, and Suisun-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z