Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richmond to Selma
This post compares Richmond, California to Selma, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Richmond (city) | Selma (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 108,853 | 24,537 |
| Income (median) | $42,533 | $35,716 |
| Home Value (median) | $371,900 | $171,200 |
| White | 39% | 78% |
| Black | 20% | 0% |
| Asian | 14% | 4% |
| With Kids | 34% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 30 |
| Rentals | 49% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richmond or Selma?
A: Richmond has a much larger population count than Selma: 108853 compared with 24537 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richmond or in Selma?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Richmond.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richmond or Selma?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Richmond.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Richmond does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Richmond versus 41% for Selma.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richmond may include: Vallejo, Pittsburg, and Suisun-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z