Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richmond to San Francisco
This post compares Richmond, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Richmond (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 108,853 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $42,533 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $371,900 | $927,400 |
| White | 39% | 47% |
| Black | 20% | 5% |
| Asian | 14% | 34% |
| With Kids | 34% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 38 |
| Rentals | 49% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richmond or San Francisco?
A: Richmond has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 108853 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richmond or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Richmond.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richmond or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Richmond.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Richmond versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richmond may include: Vallejo, Pittsburg, and Suisun-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z