Compare-Cities.com
Compare Richmond to Riverbank
This post compares Richmond, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Richmond (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 108,853 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $42,533 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $371,900 | $247,200 |
| White | 39% | 79% |
| Black | 20% | 0% |
| Asian | 14% | 4% |
| With Kids | 34% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 32 |
| Rentals | 49% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Richmond or Riverbank?
A: Richmond has a much larger population count than Riverbank: 108853 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Richmond or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Richmond.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Richmond or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Richmond.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Richmond does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 49% for Richmond versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Richmond may include: Vallejo, Pittsburg, and Suisun-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z